CAPIC REVIEW

Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Business Management

ISSN 0718-4662

logo revista Capic Review
Vol. 23 (2025): CAPIC REVIEW
Investigation

Clustering of Green, Social, Sustainability, and Sustainability-Linked Bonds (2014–2023)

Dominique Garrido Araya
Universidad de Valparaiso
Michelle Díaz Gula
Universidad de Valparaíso
Alejandra Espinosa Vera
Universidad de Valparaíso
Categories

Published 2026-03-09

Keywords

  • bonos verdes, bonos sociales, bonos sostenibles, sustainability-linked bonds, finanzas sostenibles, clustering, segmentación de mercado.

How to Cite

Garrido Araya, D., Díaz Gula, M., & Espinosa Vera, A. . (2026). Clustering of Green, Social, Sustainability, and Sustainability-Linked Bonds (2014–2023). CAPIC REVIEW, 23. https://doi.org/10.35928/cr.vol23.2025.266

Abstract

Green, social, sustainability, and sustainability-linked bonds have become relevant mechanisms for channeling capital toward projects with environmental and
social benefits. However, much of the empirical literature has focused on market
growth, issuance credibility, and pricing, while less evidence is available on the
structural heterogeneity of the global market. The aim of this study is to analyze
the sustainable finance ecosystem by classifying green, social, sustainability, and
sustainability-linked bonds issued between 2014 and 2023 through clustering techniques. The study starts from a public database of 2,546 records and builds an analytical sample of 2,340 observations, for which the year variable is derived from the
Latest External Review Report field. Based on this sample, a descriptive analysis and
an unsupervised segmentation using K-means were performed on transformed and
standardized quantitative variables. The results show the predominance of green
bonds in both frequency and aggregate amount, a marked geographic and sectoral
concentration, and three distinct segments differentiated by issuance scale and recurrence: small-scale and low-recurrence issuances, large-scale and high-recurrence
issuances, and intermediate-scale issuances with moderate recurrence. This study
provides a structural and reproducible reading of the sustainable debt market that
may serve as a basis for future research on spreads, external review credibility, and
financial performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Allman, E., & Lock, B. (2024). External reviews and green bond credibility. Journal of Climate Finance, 7, 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclimf.2024.100036
  2. Baker, M., Bergstresser, D., Serafeim, G., & Wurgler, J. (2022). The pricing and ownership of U.S. green bonds. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14, 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-111620-014802
  3. Chen, X., & Long, W. (2023). To enhance the credibility of the green bond market through regulating GBERs: The case of China. Laws, 12(6), Article 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12060091
  4. Dorfleitner, G., Utz, S., & Zhang, R. (2022). The pricing of green bonds: External reviews and the shades of green. Review of Managerial Science, 16(3), 797–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00458-9
  5. Ehlers, T., & Packer, F. (2017). Green bond finance and certification. BIS Quarterly Review, September, 89–104.
  6. Fatica, S., & Panzica, R. (2021). Green bonds as a tool against climate change? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2688–2701. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2771
  7. Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010
  8. International Capital Market Association. (2021a). Green Bond Principles (June 2021). https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2021-updates/Green-Bond-Principles-June-2021-100621.pdf
  9. International Capital Market Association. (2021b). Social Bond Principles (June 2021). https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2021-updates/Social-Bond-Principles-June-2021-140621.pdf
  10. International Capital Market Association. (2021c). Sustainability Bond Guidelines (June 2021). https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2021-updates/Sustainability-Bond-Guidelines-June-2021-140621.pdf
  11. International Capital Market Association. (2023). Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles (June 2023). https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2023-updates/Sustainability-Linked-Bond-Principles-June-2023-220623.pdf
  12. Maltais, A., & Nykvist, B. (2021). Understanding the role of green bonds in advancing sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1724864
  13. Regulation (EU) 2023/2631 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 November 2023 on European Green Bonds and optional disclosures for bonds marketed as environmentally sustainable and for sustainability-linked bonds. (2023). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2631/oj
  14. Simeth, N. (2022). The value of external reviews in the secondary green bond market. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102306
  15. Tang, D. Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Do shareholders benefit from green bonds? Journal of Corporate Finance, 61, Article 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.12.001
  16. Torricelli, C., & Pellati, E. (2023). Social bonds and the social premium. Journal of Economics and Finance, 47(3), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-023-09620-3
  17. Zerbib, O. D. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 98, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012

CHILEAN UNIVERSITIES

FOREIGN UNIVERSITIES

Code under GNU license: OJS PKP