CAPIC REVIEW

Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Business Management

ISSN 0718-4662

logo revista Capic Review
Vol. 17 (2019): CAPIC REVIEW
Investigation

Value relevance of intangibles: pre-IFRS and IFRS analysis in the argentine capital market

Cecilia Ficco
Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto
Categories

Published 2020-07-07

Keywords

  • intangible assets,
  • intellectual capital,
  • argentine capital market,
  • IFRS,
  • value relevance

How to Cite

Ficco, C., & Sader, G. (2020). Value relevance of intangibles: pre-IFRS and IFRS analysis in the argentine capital market. CAPIC REVIEW, 17, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.35928/cr.vol17.2019.54

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyze the effect of the adoption of the IFRS on the relevance that the Argentine capital market assigns to the financial information on intangible assets and to the non-financial information referred to the intellectual capital of listed companies.

The analysis is carried out applying price models based on Ohlson (1995), with data collected directly from original sources and corresponding to the period 2009-2015.

The results reveal that the adoption of IFRS produced changes in the value relevance of intangible assets, but it has not impacted on the value relevance of intellectual capital. In addition, they show that human and structural dimensions are not considered by investors, in any of the two stages (IFRS and pre-IFRS), while structural capital has a negative impact on prices in both periods.

These findings are consistent with those provided by previous studies and, in particular, those related to intellectual capital, are similar to those obtained for low-developed countries, where there is no significant evidence that support its value relevance. They contribute, in this way, to increase the existing evidence regarding the role of intangibles in the external valuation of companies and the implications of the application of the IASB's regulatory framework, which is particularly limited for underdeveloped markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alfraih, M. (2017). The value relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: empirical evidence from Kuwait. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, vol. 25 n° 1, pp. 22-38.
  2. Barth, M., Beaver, W. y Landsman, W. (2001). The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 31 n° 1-3, pp. 77-104.
  3. Barth, M. y Clinch, G. (2009). Scale effects in capital markets-based accounting research. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, vol. 36 n° 3-4, pp. 253-288.
  4. Bernal, J. y Reverte, C. (2016). Herramienta de valoración de empresas. Estrategia Financiera. n° 336, pp. 8-19.
  5. Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, vol. 32 n° 2, pp. 63-76.
  6. Bontis, N., Chong, W. y Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 1 n° 1, pp. 85-100.
  7. Cañibano, L., Sánchez, M. García, M. y Chaminade, C. (2002). Directrices para la gestión y difusión de información sobre intangibles (Informe de Capital Intelectual). Proyecto Meritum. Fundación Airtel Móvil, Madrid.
  8. Cazavan-Jeny, A. y Jeanjean, T. (2006). The negative impact of R&D capitalization: A value relevance approach. European Accounting Review, vol. 15 n° 1, pp. 37-61.
  9. Chalmers, K., Clinch, G. y Godfrey, J. (2008). Adoption of international financial reporting standards: Impact on the value relevance of intangible assets. Australian Accounting Review, vol. 18 n° 3, pp. 237-247.
  10. Cooke, T. (1992). The Impact of size, stock market listing and industry type on disclosure in the annual reports of japanese listed corporations. Accounting and Business Research, vol. 22 n° 87, pp. 229-237.
  11. Da Silva, A., Rodrigues, T. y Klann, R. (2017). A influência dos ativos intangíveis na relevância da informação contábil. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, vol. 14 n° 31, pp. 26-45.
  12. De Jager, P. (2008). Panel data techniques and accounting research. Meditari Accountancy Research, vol. 16 n° 2, pp. 53-68.
  13. Dumay, J. (2016). A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: From reporting to disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 17 n° 1, pp. 168–184.
  14. Edvinsson, L. y Malone, M. (1997). Intellectual Capital. Realizing your company´s true value by findings its hidden brainpower. Harper Collins Publishers, New York.
  15. Ely, K. y Waymire, G. (1999). Accounting standard-setting organizations and earnings relevance: Longitudinal evidence from NYSE common stocks, 1927-93. Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 37 n° 2, pp. 293-317.
  16. Federación Argentina de Consejos Profesionales de Ciencias Económicas (2019). Resoluciones Técnicas vigentes. FACPCE, Buenos Aires.
  17. Ferraro, O. y Veltri, S. (2011). The value relevance of intellectual capital on the firm’s market value: An empirical survey on the Italian listed firms. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, vol. 2 n° 1, pp. 66-84.
  18. Ficco, C. (2018). La relevancia valorativa de los activos intangibles y del capital intelectual en el mercado de capitales argentino. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.
  19. García, E. y Martínez, I. (2004). Divulgación voluntaria de información empresarial: índices de revelación. Partida Doble, n° 157, pp. 66-77.
  20. García, E., Martínez, I. y Larrán, M. (2004). El modelo EBO y la relevancia valorativa de la información sobre capital intelectual. Una aproximación empírica (parte II). Análisis Financiero, n° 93, pp. 92-101.
  21. Giner, B. (1997). The influence of company characteristic and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms. The European Accounting Review, vol. 6 n° 1, pp. 45-68.
  22. Giner, B., Reverte, C. y Arce, M. (2002). El papel del análisis fundamental en la investigación del mercado de capitales: Análisis crítico de su evolución. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, vol. 31 n° 114, pp. 1111-1150.
  23. Hayes, R. y Abernathy, W. (1980). Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Business Review, vol. 58 n° 4, pp. 67-77.
  24. Infante, R. y Ferrer, R. (2017). The impact of intangibles on the value relevance of accounting information: An empirical examination of listed companies in the Philippines from 2012 to 2016. Proceedings of the Institute for Global Business Research Conference, USA.
  25. International Accounting Standards Board (2018). Norma Internacional de Contabilidad N° 38: Activos intangibles. IASB, London.
  26. International Accounting Standards Board (2018). Norma Internacional de Información Financiera N° 3: Combinaciones de negocios. IASB, London.
  27. Kimouche, B. y Rouabhi, A. (2016a). The impact of intangibles on the value relevance of accounting information: Evidence from French companies. Intangible Capital, vol. 12 n° 2, pp. 506-529.
  28. Kimouche, B. y Rouabhi, A. (2016b). Intangibles and value relevance of accounting information: Evidence from UK companies. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, vol. 12 n° 2, pp. 437-458.
  29. Larrán, M. y Giner, B. (2002). The use of the internet for corporate reporting by Spanish companies. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, vol. 2 n° 1, pp. 53-82.
  30. Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: management, measurement and reporting. The Brookings Institution Press, Washington.
  31. Liu, D., Tseng, K. y Yen, S. (2009). The incremental impact of intellectual capital on value creation.Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 10 n° 2, pp. 260-276.
  32. Maditinos, D., Chatzoudes, D., Charalampos, T. y Theriou, G. (2011). The impact of intellectual capital on firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 12 n° 1, pp. 132-151.
  33. Nimtrakoon, S. (2015). The relationship between intellectual capital, firms’ market value and financial performance: Empirical evidence from the ASEAN. Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 16 n° 3, pp. 587-618.
  34. Ohlson, J. (1995). Earnings, book values and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporany Accounting Research, vol. 11 n° 2, pp. 661-687.
  35. Oliveira, L., Rodrigues, L. y Craig, R. (2010). Intangible assets and value relevance: Evidence from the Portuguese stock exchange. The British Accounting Review, vol. 42 n° 4, pp. 241-252.
  36. Ortiz, E. y Clavel, J. (2006). Índices de revelación de información: una propuesta de mejora de la metodología. Aplicación a la información sobre recursos humanos incluida en los Informes 20F. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, vol. 35 n° 128, pp. 87-113.
  37. Patelli, L. y Prencipe, A. (2007). The relationship between voluntary disclosure and independent directors in the presence of a dominant shareholder. European Accounting Review, vol. 16 n° 1, pp. 5-33.
  38. Rodríguez, G. (2004). Factores explicativos de la revelación voluntaria de información. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, vol. 33 n° 122, pp. 705-739.
  39. Rodríguez, L., Gallego, I. y García, I. (2010). Determinantes de la divulgación voluntaria de información estratégica en internet: Un estudio de las empresas españolas cotizadas. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol. 19 n° 1, pp. 9-26.
  40. Roos, G., Roos, J., Dragonetti, N. y Edvinsson, L. (2001). Capital Intelectual. Paidós, Buenos Aires.
  41. Sharma, P. (2018). Enterprise value and intellectual capital: Study of BSE 500 firms. Accounting and Finance Research, vol. 7 n° 2, pp. 123-133.
  42. Sosa, M. (2013). El capital intelectual en mercados en desarrollo. El caso de Paraguay. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Sevilla, España.
  43. Sotomayor, S. y Larrán, M. (2005). La valoración de empresas y los intangibles. Partida Doble, n° 66, pp. 62-83.
  44. Suherman, R. (2017). The impact of intellectual capital toward firm’s profitability and market value of retail companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2013-2016. iBuss Management, vol. 5 n° 1, pp. 98-112.
  45. Wang, J. (2008). Investigating market value and intellectual capital for SyP 500. Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 9 n° 4, pp. 546-563.
  46. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, vol. 48 n° 4, pp. 817-838.

CHILEAN UNIVERSITIES

FOREIGN UNIVERSITIES

Code under GNU license: OJS PKP